Skip to main content

Government Debt Relief Schemes (DRS)

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued guidelines on Government Debt Relief Schemes (DRS). The guidelines include (i) model operating procedure (MOP) shared with the State Governments for their consideration while designing and implementing DRS and (ii) prudential guidelines for the Regulated Entities (REs).

Model operating procedure (MOP) shared with the State Governments for their consideration while designing and implementing DRS

What is Government Debt Relief Scheme (DRS)?

Debt Relief Schemes (DRS) refer to schemes notified by the State Governments that entail funding by the fiscal authorities to cover debt obligations of a targeted segment of borrowers that the lending institutions are required to sacrifice / waive. 

What are the pre-requisites for announcing DRS?

  • Announcement / notification of DRS should include the specific stress or distress situation necessitating announcement of such support. DRS should be considered only as a measure of last resort when other measures to alleviate financial stress have failed.
  • Before announcing any DRS, Governments may engage with the State Level Bankers’ Committee (SLBC) / District level Consultative Committee (DCC) to evolve a coordinated action plan for conceptualisation, design, and implementation of the DRS. 
  • The schemes should cover critical aspects like identification of borrowers, impact assessment, implementation timelines, resolution of issues concerning settlement of dues by Government to the lending institutions, etc.
  • It should be ensured that the DRS do not impact the financial stability aspects of the region / State or create moral hazards in the borrower segments. 
  • Conformance to relevant regulatory guidelines on loan settlement, reporting to credit information companies etc. should also be taken into account. 

How shall DRS be designed?

  • The DRS should be targeted only at the impacted borrowers and should not contain any restrictive covenant against timely repayments. 
  • It should specify the criteria for determining eligible borrowers on an objective basis, detailed timeline of critical / material events, including cut-off dates for filing / submission, acknowledgement, approval and settlement of claims along with compensation clauses for delays in settling the funds, on part of the Government.
  • The DRS should cover the entire outstanding dues of the borrowers being covered, including principal and accumulated interest till the date of receipt of funds by the lending institutions from the Government.
  • The DRS should not require the creation of a receivable in the books of the lending institution against the Government. The exposure of lending institutions to the borrower shall continue and shall be reduced to the extent of funds received from the Government.
  • The entire implementation of the scheme and settlement of claims by the Governments to the banks, should generally be completed within 45 to 60 days.
  • The DRS should not contain any provision contrary to any regulatory instruction issued by RBI / NABARD.
  • The DRS should not contain any provision that casts any obligations on the lending institutions, directly or indirectly, to –
    • Waive / sacrifice a part or whole of its dues from the borrower.
    • Extend fresh credit to borrowers whose debt has been waived.
    • Make any commitments in anticipation of future budgetary support.
    • Stop pursuing legal avenues available to them, for recovery of dues from the borrower, pending receipt of funds from the Government.
  • However, if the lending institutions agree to any of the above at the time of design of DRS or subsequently, it shall be subject to the applicable prudential guidelines.

What shall be the budgetary provisions for DRS?

  • Detailed budgetary provisions / funding may be provided upfront towards any proposed DRS to fully cover the required settlement amounts. 
  • Where lenders have dues from the Government, pertaining to earlier DRS schemes, new schemes should be announced only on a fully pre-funded basis.

Prudential guidelines for the Regulated Entities (REs)

Which Regulated Entities (REs) can participate in DRS?

  • Regulated Entities (REs) may decide on participating in a particular DRS notified by a Government, based on its Board approved policy. 
  • Any provision of the scheme that may warrant modification in long term interest of the borrowers or for prudential reasons may be duly brought to the notice of the concerned authorities through SLBC / DCC, during the consultation phase while designing the DRS.
  • The REs shall clearly determine the eventual outstanding that may crystallise in their books in respect of the borrowers proposed to be covered under the DRS, including the accumulated interest in non-performing accounts, by the time the dues are settled under the DRS, to enable the Government to suitably arrange for the extent of fiscal participation.

How shall borrowers be selected under DRS?

  • The REs shall ensure that the borrowers to be covered under DRS are selected strictly as per terms of such schemes so as to avoid subsequent non-admission by the authorities on technical grounds.
  • The terms and conditions of the scheme as well as the prudential aspects, including cooling period for extending fresh credit, impact on credit score etc., shall be clearly communicated to the borrowers at the time of obtaining explicit consent from the borrower for availing benefits under the proposed DRS.

What should be the impact of DRS on loan accounts?

  • There shall not be creation of any receivable against the Government on account of the DRS and the exposure shall continue to be on the borrower till receipt of funds by the RE. 
  • Till receipt of funds, REs shall continue to apply the prudential norms including prudential norms on income recognition, asset classification and provisioning. 
  • Wherever the accounts are non-performing, REs may pursue recovery measures against such borrowers.
  • Any waiver of accrued but unrealised interest and / or sacrifice of principal undertaken by REs in the borrower accounts of beneficiaries of the DRS, either as part of the implementation of the DRS or subsequent to its implementation, shall be treated as a compromise settlement and shall attract the applicable prudential treatment.
  • If the funds received by the RE as part of the DRS covers the entire outstanding dues of the borrower, the same shall lead to extinguishment of borrower’s debt obligations.
  • In cases where the funds received by the RE as part of the scheme are not adequate to cover the entire outstanding dues of the borrower, the asset classification of the residual exposure shall be evaluated as per the terms and conditions of the original loan contract. Any changes / modifications to the terms and conditions of the original loan contract in such cases shall be evaluated against the test of restructuring and shall attract the prudential treatment therein.
  • Any fresh credit exposure to such borrowers shall be as per the commercial discretion of the RE.

What are other instructions?

In respect of relief measures announced prior to the introduction of the guidelines on DRS, any dues pending receipt from Government, for more than 90 days shall attract specific provision of 100%.


References

Reserve Bank of India. (2024, December 31). 'Government Debt Relief Schemes (DRS)'. Retrieved from https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=12760&Mode=0


Follow at - Telegram   Instagram   LinkedIn   X   Facebook

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Framework for recognition of Self-Regulatory Organisation (SRO) for Payment System Operators (PSOs)

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had released the framework for recognition of Self-Regulatory Organisation (SRO) for Payment System Operators (PSOs). What is the need of Self-Regulatory Organisation (SRO) for Payment System Operators (PSOs)? Industry self-governance helps in industry-wide smooth operations and ecosystem development. RBI’s Payment and Settlement Systems Vision 2019-21 had, therefore, envisaged the setting up of an SRO for PSOs. Accordingly, the framework for recognition of SRO for PSOs was released in October 2020. What shall be the role of SRO for PSOs? An SRO is a non-governmental organisation that sets and enforces rules and standards relating to the conduct of member entities in the industry, with the aim of protecting the customer and promoting ethical and professional standards.  The SRO is expected to resolve disputes among its members internally through mutually accepted processes to ensure that members operate in a disciplined environment and even accept penal ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 – Part-V – Section 45B to 45JA

The Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 provides the statutory basis of the functioning of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). In a series of articles, we will briefly go through the provisions of RBI Act, 1934. This is the fifth article in the series.  Chapter IIIA - Collection and Furnishing of Credit Information Section 45B – Power of Bank to collect credit information RBI may collect credit information from banking companies and furnish it to any banking company in accordance with section 45D. Section 45C – Power to call for returns containing credit information RBI may direct any banking company to submit statements relating to credit information. Section 45D – Procedure for furnishing credit information to banking companies A banking company may apply to RBI to provide credit information. RBI shall furnish the requested credit information without disclosing the names of the banking companies which have submitted the information. RBI may levy fees of up to Rs.25 for furnishing credit...
Post a Comment
Read more

RBI’s Monetary Policy (December 05, 2025): In A Nutshell

The bi-monthly monetary policy of Reserve Bank of India (RBI) was announced on December 05, 2025. Here are some of the highlights of the monetary policy announcement. Rates   Change Rate Policy repo rate Reduced by 25 bps 5.25% Standing deposit facility (SDF) rate 5.00% Marginal standing facility (MSF) rate 5.50% Bank rate 5.50% Monetary policy stance Monetary policy stance unchanged as ‘neutral’. Domestic Economy  Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth accelerated to 8.2% in Q2, buoyed by strong spending during the festive season which was further facilitated by the rationalisation of the goods and services tax (GST) rates.  Real GDP growth for 2025-26 is projected at 7.3%. For the first time since the adoption of flexible inflation targeting (FIT), average headline inflation for a quarter at 1.7% in Q2, breached the lower tolerance threshold (2%) of the inflation target (4%). It dipped further to an all-time low of 0.3% in October 2025. The underlying inflation pressu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 – Part-II – Section 17 to 19

The Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 provides the statutory basis of the functioning of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). In a series of articles, we will briefly go through the provisions of RBI Act, 1934. This is the second article in the series.  Section 17 – Business which the Bank may transact RBI shall be authorized to carry on and transact the several kinds of business hereinafter specified, namely – 17(1) – Accept deposit without interest from the Central / State Government, local authorities, banks and any other persons. 17(1A) – Accept deposit, repayable with interest, from banks or any other person under the Standing Deposit Facility Scheme, as approved by the Central Board, for the purposes of liquidity management.   Bills of Exchange (B/E) & Promissory Note (PN) Bearing 2 or more good signatures, one of which shall be of B/E & PN arising out of Maturing within 17(2)(a) Purchase, sale and rediscou...
Post a Comment
Read more

Systematically Important Banks (SIBs)

Some banks are identified as systematically important and are subjected to higher capital requirements. When are banks termed as systematically important? What are the additional capital requirements for such banks? And which are the systematically important banks in India? What are Systematically Important Banks (SIBs)? Systematically Important Banks (SIBs) are perceived as banks that are ‘Too Big To Fail (TBTF)’.  Why additional policy measures are required for SIBs? The perception of TBTF creates an expectation of government support for these banks at the time of distress. Due to this perception, these banks enjoy certain advantages in the funding markets. However, the perceived expectation of government support amplifies risk-taking, reduces market discipline, creates competitive distortions, and increases the probability of distress in the future. These considerations require that SIBs should be subjected to additional policy measures to deal with the systemic risks and moral ...
Post a Comment
Read more