Skip to main content

Wilful Defaulters and Large Defaulters

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued directions on wilful defaulters and large defaulters.

What is wilful default?

Wilful default shall be deemed to have occurred –

  • When the borrower defaults in meeting payment / repayment obligations to the lender.
  • When the guarantor does not honour the guarantee when invoked by the lender.

and any one or more of the following features are noticed –

Conditions / features Applicable to Borrower Applicable to Guarantor
Has the capacity to honour the said obligations.

✓

✓
Has diverted the funds availed under the credit facility from lender.

✓

 NA
Has siphoned off the funds availed under the credit facility from lender.

✓

 NA
Has disposed of immovable / movable assets provided for securing the credit facility without the approval of the lender.

✓

✓
Has failed in its commitment to the lender to infuse equity despite having the ability to infuse the equity, although the lender has provided loans or certain concessions to the borrower based on this commitment.

✓

✓

Who is wilful defaulter?

Wilful defaulter means –

  • A borrower or a guarantor who has committed wilful default and the outstanding amount is ₹25 lakh and above.
  • Where the borrower or a guarantor committing the wilful default is a company, its promoters and the director. 
  • In case of entity (other than companies), persons who are in charge and responsible for the management of the affairs of the entity.

Who is large defaulter?

Large defaulter means a defaulter with an outstanding amount of ₹1 crore and above and –

  • Where suit has been filed.
  • Whose account has been classified as doubtful / loss.

What is credit facility?

Credit facility means any fund based or non-fund-based facility, including off-balance sheet items like derivatives, guarantees and letters of credit, which a lender has extended to the borrower.

What is diversion of fund?

Diversion of funds means and includes –

  • Utilisation of short-term working capital funds for long-term purposes not in conformity with the terms of sanction of credit facility.
  • Deploying funds availed using credit facility for the creation of assets other than those for which the credit was sanctioned.
  • Transferring funds availed using credit facility to the subsidiaries / group companies or other entities, by whatever modality, without approval of the lender / all the lenders in the consortium.
  • Routing of funds through any lender other than the lender or members of consortium without prior written permission of the lender / all the lenders of consortium.
  • Investing funds availed using credit facility in other companies / entities by way of acquiring equities / debt instruments without the approval of lender / all the lenders of consortium.
  • Shortfall in the deployment of funds vis-à-vis the amounts disbursed / drawn under the credit facility and the difference not being accounted for.

What is siphoning of funds?

Siphoning of funds shall be construed to have occurred if any funds availed using credit facility from lenders are utilised for purposes unrelated to the operations of the borrower.

Who are lenders as per the directions?

Lender means an All India Financial Institution (AIFI), a bank, or Non-banking financial company (NBFC) which has granted a credit facility to the borrower.

AIFI Export Import Bank of India (EXIM Bank)
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD)
National Housing Bank (NHB)
Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI)
National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development (NaBFID)
Bank Commercial Banks
Scheduled Primary (Urban) Co-operative Banks (UCBs)
Non - Scheduled UCBs falling under tier 3 and 4 category
Regional Rural Banks (RRBs)
Local Area Banks (LABs)
NBFC NBFCs under NBFC-Middle Layer (NBFC-ML) and above layers

What is Identification Committee and Review Committee?

  • Identification Committee means the committee constituted by a lender for identifying a wilful defaulter.
  • Review Committee means the committee constituted by a lender for the purpose of reviewing the proposal of the Identification Committee. The Review Committee shall not be comprised of members who are part of the Identification Committee.

Lenders Composition of Identification Committee Composition of Review Committee
Commercial banks (other than foreign banks and RRBs) and AIFIs Whole-Time Director (WTD) other than the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer (MD & CEO) / CEO or equivalent official as chairperson and 2 senior officials as members, not more than 2 ranks below the chairperson of the committee.
In case, there is only 1 WTD other than the MD & CEO / CEO or equivalent official, such WTD may be part of the review committee if the post of MD & CEO / CEO or equivalent official is vacant. In such cases an official 1 rank below the WTD may chair the identification committee, with 2 senior officials as members, not more than 1 rank below the chairperson of the committee. 		WTD who is the MD & CEO / CEO or equivalent official as chairperson and 2 independent directors or non-executive directors or equivalent officials as members.
Where the post of MD & CEO / CEO or equivalent official is vacant, the Review Committee shall be constituted with a WTD in place of MD & CEO / CEO or equivalent official. In such cases, Review Committee shall be chaired by independent directors or non-executive directors or equivalent officials.
Commercial banks (excluding Foreign Banks, Small Finance Banks, LABs and RRBs) In respect of credit facilities below a threshold, an Identification Committee may be set up with an officer just below the rank of WTD as chairperson and 2 senior officials as members, not more than 2 ranks below the chairperson of the committee.
Multiple identification committees may be formed. 		In respect of credit facilities below a threshold, a Review Committee may be constituted with an officer of the rank of WTD or equivalent official as the chairperson and 2 senior officials as members, not more than 2 ranks below the chairperson of the committee.
Multiple review committees may be formed.
Foreign Banks An officer not more than 1 rank below the Country Head / CEO as chairperson and 2 senior officials, not more than 2 ranks below the chairperson of the committee, as members. Country Head / CEO as chairperson and 2 senior officials, not more than 1 rank below the chairperson of the committee, as members.
UCBs An officer not more than 1 rank below the MD / CEO as chairperson and 2 senior officials, not more than 2 ranks below the chairperson of the committee, as members. MD / CEO as the chairperson, and 2 professional directors as members.
NBFCs MD / CEO as chairperson with 2 independent directors or non-executive directors or equivalent officials, as members.
RRBs An officer not more than 1 rank below the chairman of the RRB as chairperson and 2 senior officials, not more than 2 ranks below the chairperson of the committee, as members. Chairman of the RRB shall be the chairperson of the committee and 2 directors nominated under clause 9.1(a) or 9.1(d) of the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976 shall be the members.

What is the mechanism for identification and classification of wilful defaulters?

The identification of the wilful default should be made keeping in view the track record of the borrowers and should not be decided on the basis of isolated transactions / incidents. A lender shall identify and classify a person as a ‘wilful defaulter’ as per the following procedure –

  • The evidence of wilful default shall be examined by an Identification Committee.
  • If the Identification Committee is satisfied that an event of wilful default has occurred, it shall issue a show-cause notice to borrower / guarantor / promoter / director / persons who are in charge and responsible for the management of the affairs of the entity, and call for the submissions within 21 days of issuance of show cause notice. 
  • After considering the submissions, the Identification Committee shall make a proposal to the Review Committee for classification as a wilful defaulter.
  • The borrower / guarantor / promoter / director / persons who are in charge and responsible for the management of the affairs of the entity shall thereafter be suitably advised about the proposal to classify them as wilful defaulter.
  • An opportunity shall be provided to borrower / guarantor / promoter / director / persons who are in charge and responsible for the management of the affairs of the entity for making a written representation to Review Committee within 15 days of such a proposal from the Identification Committee.
  • The proposal of the Identification Committee along with the written representation received shall be considered by the Review Committee.
  • The Review Committee shall provide an opportunity for a personal hearing also. However, if the opportunity is not availed or if the personal hearing is not attended by the borrower / guarantor / promoter / director / persons who are in charge and responsible for the management of the affairs of the entity, the Review Committee shall, after assessing the facts or material on record, take a decision.
  • The borrower / guarantor / promoter / director / persons in charge and responsible for the management of affairs shall not have the right to be represented by a lawyer.
  • The Review Committee shall pass a reasoned order and the same shall be communicated to the wilful defaulter.

What are the directions on review of accounts for identification of wilful default?

  • The lender shall examine the ‘wilful default’ aspect in all Non-Performing Assets (NPA) accounts with outstanding amount of ₹25 lakh and above. If wilful default is observed in the internal preliminary screening, the lenders shall complete the process of classification / declaring the borrower as a wilful defaulter within 6 months of the account being classified as NPA.
  • In respect of accounts where ‘wilful default’ was not observed during the initial examination, the aspects regarding 'wilful default' shall be subsequently re-examined in terms of the board approved policy of the lender.

What measures shall be taken against wilful defaulters?

  • Based on the facts and circumstances of each case, lenders can examine whether initiation of criminal proceedings against wilful defaulters is warranted. 
  • The lenders shall formulate a non-discriminatory board-approved policy that sets out the criteria based on which the photographs of persons classified and declared as wilful defaulter shall be published.
  • No additional credit facility shall be granted by any lender to a wilful defaulter or any entity with which a wilful defaulter is associated for 1 year after the name of wilful defaulter has been removed from the list of wilful defaulters (LWD) by the lender.
  • No credit facility shall be granted by any lender for floating of new ventures to a wilful defaulter or any entity with which a wilful defaulter is associated for 5 years after the name of wilful defaulter has been removed from the LWD by the lender.
  • Wilful defaulters or any entity with which a wilful defaulter is associated shall not be eligible for restructuring of credit facility. 
  • The lender shall, wherever warranted, initiate legal action against the borrowers / guarantors for foreclosure / recovery of dues expeditiously.

What are the liabilities of a guarantor?

  • As per Section 128 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the liability of the guarantor is coextensive with that of the principal debtor unless it is otherwise provided by the contract.
  • When a default happens in making payment / repayment by the principal debtor, the lender will be able to proceed against the guarantor even without exhausting the remedies against the principal debtor.
  • In case the said guarantor refuses to comply with the demand made by the lender, such guarantor shall also be considered for classification as a wilful defaulter.

What are the directions on reporting of credit information?

  • All entities regulated by RBI, including ‘lenders’, shall submit information to all credit information companies (CICs) in respect of the large defaulters at monthly intervals –
    • List of suit filed accounts of large defaulters
    • List of non-suit filed accounts of large defaulters whose account has been classified as doubtful / loss
  • All lenders or the ARCs to which the account has been transferred, shall submit at monthly intervals, information to all CICs in respect of the wilful defaulters –
    • LWD in respect of suit filed accounts
    • LWD in respect of non-suit filed accounts
  • The lender, or the ARC to which the account has been transferred, shall inform all CICs the removal of the name of the wilful defaulter from the LWD within 30 days from the date when the outstanding amount falls below the threshold of ₹25 lakh.
  • The entities regulated by RBI or lenders, as applicable, shall report to CICs the details of guarantors who have failed to honour the commitments thereunder when invoked, as large defaulters / wilful defaulters, as the case may be. 

What is the role of statutory auditors and third parties?

  • In case any falsification of accounts on the part of the borrowers is observed by the lender, and the auditors are found to be negligent or deficient in conducting the audit, the lender shall consider lodging a formal complaint against the statutory auditors of the borrowers with the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) / Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI).
  • Pending disciplinary action by NFRA / ICAI, the complaints shall be forwarded to RBI and Indian Banks’ Association (IBA). IBA shall, in turn, prepare a caution list of such auditors for circulation among the lenders.
  • In case of wilful defaults, there should be some accountability for the third parties engaged by the lender, if they have played a vital role in credit sanction / disbursement and are found negligent or deficient in their work or have facilitated the wilful default by the borrower.
  • The lender shall forward the details of these third parties to IBA (irrespective of lender’s membership status with IBA). IBA shall, in turn, prepare caution lists of such third parties and circulate to all the regulated entities of RBI.


References

Reserve Bank of India. (2024, July 30). 'Master Direction on Treatment of Wilful Defaulters and Large Defaulters'. Retrieved from https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=12713&Mode=0


Follow at - Telegram   Instagram   LinkedIn   X   Facebook

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Nomination for demat accounts and mutual fund folios

Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) had revised the guidelines on nomination for demat accounts and mutual fund folios.   Which entities are covered by the guidelines? The following regulated entities (REs) are covered by the guidelines – Asset Management Companies (AMCs) of Mutual Funds (MFs) and their Registrars to an issue and share Transfer Agents (RTAs)  Association of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI)  Recognized Depositories  Registered Depository Participants (DPs) What are the guidelines on nomination facility? Nomination shall be mandatory for single holding and optional for jointly held accounts / folios. However, an investor having single holding / account / folio can opt-out of nomination, either online or through physical / offline mode. In case a joint account / folio becomes single holding, post the demise of holders, either nomination or ‘opt-out’, is mandatory. Investors shall have the option to specify guardians when nominees are minors....
Post a Comment
Read more

Amendments in / additions to forex guidelines

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has amended various forex guidelines. This article lists out some of the such recent amendments. What are the updates in the existing guidelines? Previous guidelines Revised guidelines Persons resident outside India that maintain a rupee account in terms of regulation 7(1) of Foreign Exchange Management (Deposit) Regulations, 2016 may purchase or sell dated Government Securities / treasury bills. The amount of consideration paid for the purchases shall be out of the funds held in the said rupee account. Persons resident outside India that maintain a rupee account in terms of regulation 7(1) of Foreign Exchange Management (Deposit) Regulations, 2016 may purchase or sell dated Government Securities / treasury bills and non-convertible debentures / bonds and commercial papers issued by an Indian company. The amount of consideration paid for the purchases shall be out of the funds held in the said rupee account. The balance...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nomination Facility in Banks

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued directions on nomination facility in deposit accounts, safe deposit lockers and articles kept in safe custody with the banks. What is the legal framework for nomination facility in banks? Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (BR Act) contain provisions on nomination facility in banks. Section 45ZA – Nomination for payment of depositors' money  Where a deposit is held by a banking company to the credit of one or more persons, the depositor / all the depositors together, may nominate one person to whom in the event of his / their death, the amount of deposit may be returned by the banking company. Where the nominee is a minor, the depositor shall appoint any person to receive the amount of deposit in the event of his death during the minority of the nominee. Section 45ZC – Nomination for return of articles kept in safe custody with banking company  Where any person leaves any article in safe custody with a banking company, such person may nominate ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Framework for recognition of Self-Regulatory Organisation (SRO) for Payment System Operators (PSOs)

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had released the framework for recognition of Self-Regulatory Organisation (SRO) for Payment System Operators (PSOs). What is the need of Self-Regulatory Organisation (SRO) for Payment System Operators (PSOs)? Industry self-governance helps in industry-wide smooth operations and ecosystem development. RBI’s Payment and Settlement Systems Vision 2019-21 had, therefore, envisaged the setting up of an SRO for PSOs. Accordingly, the framework for recognition of SRO for PSOs was released in October 2020. What shall be the role of SRO for PSOs? An SRO is a non-governmental organisation that sets and enforces rules and standards relating to the conduct of member entities in the industry, with the aim of protecting the customer and promoting ethical and professional standards.  The SRO is expected to resolve disputes among its members internally through mutually accepted processes to ensure that members operate in a disciplined environment and even accept penal ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 – Part-V – Section 45B to 45JA

The Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 provides the statutory basis of the functioning of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). In a series of articles, we will briefly go through the provisions of RBI Act, 1934. This is the fifth article in the series.  Chapter IIIA - Collection and Furnishing of Credit Information Section 45B – Power of Bank to collect credit information RBI may collect credit information from banking companies and furnish it to any banking company in accordance with section 45D. Section 45C – Power to call for returns containing credit information RBI may direct any banking company to submit statements relating to credit information. Section 45D – Procedure for furnishing credit information to banking companies A banking company may apply to RBI to provide credit information. RBI shall furnish the requested credit information without disclosing the names of the banking companies which have submitted the information. RBI may levy fees of up to Rs.25 for furnishing credit...
Post a Comment
Read more